Private Housing Company Won’t Evict Domestic Violence Victims After ACLU Lawsuit (2/26/2008)
FOR
IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT:
media@aclu.org; (212) 549-2666Groundbreaking
Policies Bring Company Into Compliance With Federal
Fair Housing
Act DETROIT – A groundbreaking
settlement agreement finalized today between a domestic violence survivor, a
private housing complex and a property management company offers victims of
domestic violence, stalking, date rape and sexual assault far reaching
protections from eviction and discrimination. This is the first settlement of
its kind that applies to private housing.
The
settlement follows a federal sex discrimination lawsuit filed by the American
Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU of Michigan on behalf of Tanica Lewis - a
domestic violence survivor who had been evicted from her apartment because of
her abuser’s behavior- against the property management company Management
Systems, Inc. and the housing complex North End Village. Management Systems manages 50
housing communities in Detroit and
Flint, Michigan and
Toledo, Ohio, including
North End Village. The lawsuit charged that under
the federal Fair Housing Act, Management Systems’ policy of evicting domestic
violence victims because of their abusers’ actions constitutes sex
discrimination in violation of the federal Fair Housing Act and
Michigan’s Civil Rights Act.
“We
commend Management Systems and North End for recognizing that landlords should
not blame women for the criminal acts perpetrated against them,” said ACLU
Women's Rights Project staff attorney Sandra
Park.
“All
too often, landlords force victims of domestic violence out of their homes,
based on the stereotype that victims can control the violence and have chosen
not to do so. We hope
that this settlement encourages other private housing companies to enact
proactive policies that comply with federal law and help rather than harm
women.”
The
settlement goes beyond the federal Violence Against Women Act’s (VAWA) housing
law in both substance and scope and serves as an exemplary model for private
housing policies throughout the country. VAWA applies only to public and voucher
housing and does not affirmatively provide for early lease termination and/or
relocation to tenants who must flee violence.
Under the
settlement, North End Village and Management Systems, Inc. will
not evict or discriminate against tenants because they have been the victims of
domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault or stalking, whether or not
the abuser is residing in the tenant's household. The property management
company will also offer early lease termination and relocation to tenants who
have been the victims of such abuse and need to leave their homes to ensure
their safety.
Tanica
Lewis ended a relationship with Reuben Thomas in 2005 and obtained a personal
protection order a few months later in 2006 after he harassed and stalked her.
She informed the management company of the order that prohibited Thomas from
coming near her home in North End Village. On March 1,
2006,
however, Thomas broke the windows of her home and kicked in her door. Lewis
immediately reported the incident to the police as well as to the residential
manager of the property. Thomas was ultimately convicted of home invasion and
ordered to pay restitution. Nonetheless, based on this incident, Management
Systems Inc. issued Lewis a 30-day notice of eviction on March 13,
2006,
stating that she had violated the portion of her lease that said she would be
liable for any damage resulting from “lack of proper supervision” of her
“guests.” As a result of the eviction, Lewis and her two young daughters could
not return home and lived in a shelter. Later, they found another apartment but
the rent was much higher and was farther from Lewis’ job. She also had to
arrange new, and more costly, childcare arrangements.
“When
I reported the domestic violence, first to the police and then to my housing
manager, I thought I was making myself and my children safer. Instead, my
landlord threw us out of the apartment and we had nowhere to go,” said Lewis. “I
hope other women in private housing who are brave enough to come forward about
their abusers don’t suffer the same way.”
Studies
from across the country confirm the connection between domestic violence and
homelessness. The
2005 Hunger and Homelessness
Survey by the United States Conference of Mayors found that half of the
U.S.
cities surveyed reported that domestic violence is a primary cause of
homelessness. Another
2005 investigation by the Anti-Discrimination Center of Metro New York, a fair
housing group, found that 28 percent of
housing providers in New
York City
either flatly refused to rent to a domestic
violence victim or failed to
follow up as promised when contacted by an investigator posing as a
housing coordinator for a domestic violence survivor assistance
program.
“Landlords
often only learn about domestic
violence because victims have sought the help of police or the courts,” said Kary Moss, Executive Director
of the ACLU of Michigan. “When
victims know that they may face eviction if a landlord finds out about the
abuse, they are less likely to seek this assistance and more likely to submit to
the abuse. We hope that other private housing companies will follow Management
Systems’ lead and put in place policies that help end the cycle of violence
which sometimes compels women and their children to live on the
streets.”
The ACLU
has successfully challenged similar discriminatory policies in housing across
the country. In another case in Michigan, the Ypsilanti Housing Commission
(YHC) agreed, after the ACLU intervened, to end a policy that led to the
eviction of Aaronica Warren, a domestic violence victim. The YHC had relied on a
“one-strike rule” in its lease that permitted it to evict tenants if there was
any violence in a tenant’s apartment – even if the tenant was the victim of the
violence.
In
addition, after the ACLU became involved, a federal court in
Vermont issued a first-of-its-kind ruling
in Bouley v. Young-Sabourin in 2005,
holding that discriminating against victims of domestic violence can constitute
sex discrimination under the Fair Housing Act. The judge ruled that when a
landlord seeks to evict a tenant immediately after she has been the victim of a
domestic assault, the protection the Fair Housing Act provides against sex
discrimination is applicable.
Lewis is
represented by Park, Emily
Martin and Lenora M. Lapidus of the ACLU
Women’s Rights Project, and Moss and Michael J. Steinberg of the ACLU of
Michigan.
The
settlement and other legal documents are available online at: www.aclu.org/fairhousingforwomen
|