The United States has failed to comply with its obligations under the Convention Against Torture at home and abroad. To justify torture and abuse in the "global war on terrorism," the government narrowly defined torture and argued that the prohibition against cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment does not apply outside the United States. Its selective interpretation of the Convention justified the development of interrogation techniques that violated the treaty, created a climate of confusion among U.S. soldiers, and led to widespread torture and abuse of detainees in Guantánamo Bay, Iraq and Afghanistan.
Evidence from a range of sources, including over 100,000 government documents produced to the ACLU through Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA") litigation, show a systemic pattern of torture and abuse of detainees in U.S. custody. This abuse was the direct result of policies promulgated from high-level civilian and military leaders and the failure of these leaders to prevent torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment by subordinates. Detainees have been beaten; forced into painful stress positions; threatened with death; sexually humiliated; subjected to racial and religious insults; stripped naked; hooded and blindfolded; exposed to extreme heat and cold; denied food and water; deprived of sleep; isolated for prolonged periods; subjected to mock drownings; and intimidated by dogs.
Despite the widespread and systemic nature of the torture and abuse, the United States has refused to authorize any independent investigation into the abuses. No high-level official involved in developing or implementing the policies that led to torture and abuse has been charged with any crime related to the abuses. The government continues to assert that the abuse was simply the actions of a few rogue soldiers.
Also in violation of the Convention, the U.S. continues to engage in unlawful renditions in which the CIA kidnaps individuals and transfers them to countries known for their routine use of torture, such as Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and Syria. Other detainees have been "disappeared" to secret detention facilities overseas.
U.S. violations of the Convention Against Torture are not limited to actions by military personnel overseas in the "war on terror," but in fact are far too ubiquitous at home. When Hurricane Katrina hit New Orleans in August 2005, over a thousand prisoners were abandoned after rising water flooded the prison and were left in their cells for days without food, water, or ventilation. Prisoners and detainees inside the United States are subjected to conditions and brutal practices that are chillingly similar to those experienced by detainees abroad—prolonged solitary confinement, extreme temperatures, intimidation by dogs, painful restraints and electro-stun devices. Indeed, these similarities are not surprising, as some of the officials and soldiers who committed abuse abroad previously worked in prisons inside the United States.
Serious limitations remain on the rights of redress and remedy for victims of torture and abuse committed by government officials inside and outside of the United States. The rights of prisoners inside the United States to obtain redress are severely limited by the Prison Litigation Reform Act. And the U.S. government continues to argue that victims of abuse outside the United States have virtually no remedy for torture and abuse in United States’ courts under domestic or international law.
The United States’ Second Periodic Report ("U.S. Report") to the Committee Against Torture states that "the U.S. remains committed to respecting the rule of law, including the U.S. Constitution, federal statutes, and international treaty obligations, including the Torture Convention."[1] As discussed fully in the following report, the actions and omissions of the United States directly contradict these assurances.
D. Torture and Abuse in the "Global War on Terrorism" (Articles 1, 16)
Evidence from a range of sources, including government investigations, as well as over 100,000 government documents produced to the ACLU through the Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA") litigation, show a systemic pattern of torture and abuse of detainees in U.S. custody in Afghanistan, the U.S. Naval Base Station at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, Iraq, and other locations outside the United States.[6] In many instances the harsh treatment was ordered as part of an approved list of interrogation methods to "soften up" detainees.
Reported methods of torture and abuse used against detainees include prolonged incommunicado detention; disappearances; beatings; death threats; painful stress positions; sexual humiliation; forced nudity; exposure to extreme heat and cold; denial of food and water; sensory deprivation such as hooding and blindfolding; sleep deprivation; water-boarding; use of dogs to inspire fear; and racial and religious insults. In addition, around one hundred detainees in U.S. custody in Afghanistan and Iraq have died. The government has acknowledged that 27 deaths in U.S. custody were homicide, some caused due to "strangulation," "hypothermia," "asphyxiation," and "blunt force injuries." These techniques constitute cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment and when used in combination or for prolonged periods of time may amount to torture.
The well-documented systemic and widespread abuse against detainees was the direct result of policies promulgated by high-level civilian and military leaders and the failure of these leaders to uphold their legal duty to prevent and prohibit torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment by subordinates. Thousands of detainees remain in U.S. military custody or control in Iraq, Afghanistan, Guantánamo and other locations, and remain subject to unlawful policies and practices in violation of the Convention and other international human rights treaties.
H. Failure to Conduct Prompt and Impartial Investigations (Article 12)
The U.S. military has initiated and completed several internal investigations into allegations of abuse in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Guantánamo. The U.S. Report repeatedly cites these investigations in the wake of the Abu Ghraib scandal to showcase the government’s seriousness in responding to abuse allegations. The investigations were compromised by the fact that most of the investigations were conducted by the military itself. The U.S. has refused to authorize any independent investigation into abuses.
No high-level officials involved in developing or implementing policies on the treatment of detainees in the "global war on terrorism" have been charged with any criminal activity related to the abuses. The U.S. government continues to assert that the abuse was simply the actions of a few rogue soldiers. There has been no investigation into the government’s secret transfer of detainees and the Office of Inspector General’s examination of the role of the CIA has not yet been made public.
There have been few prosecutions for homicide compared to the number of deaths of Afghans and Iraqis in U.S. custody. In most of the official publicly-known actions taken in response to allegations of abuse, the punishment has been non-judicial or administrative. In cases where someone was convicted, the punishment generally was not commensurate with the graveness of the crime. For example, despite finding an army interrogator (the highest-ranking officer prosecuted to date) guilty of homicide, the punishment was a reprimand and a $6,000 fine.[8] In another instance, a soldier who admitted to killing an unarmed handcuffed Iraqi at point-blank received a three-year sentence.[9] Such punishments send a message that torture and abuse committed by U.S. soldiers will not be severely punished.
Domestically, the United States has no independent, effective oversight bodies to monitor police departments, jails, prisons, and immigration detention centers. State laws unduly restrict access to prisoners by the media and non-governmental human rights organizations. In the absence of an independent body for monitoring prisons and jails, federal courts have become the reluctant overseers. Conditions of confinement in jails and prisons generally change only after protracted litigation and a court order. In addition, the ability of courts to protect prisoners and monitor prison conditions was weakened significantly by the Prison Litigation Reform Act ("PLRA"), which created obstacles for prisoners attempting to file cases, find lawyers, and obtain meaningful redress.[10]
Recommendations to the United States
Withdraw reservations and understandings and make necessary declarations
- Withdraw reservation to Article 16 and understanding to Article 1, which have been relied upon to limit the definition of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, and to limit extraterritorial application of the Convention Against Torture.
- Withdraw legal opinions that permit torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, and replace them with an interpretation that is consistent with the Convention Against Torture.
- Make declarations according to Article 22 of the Convention Against Torture to recognize the competence of the Committee Against Torture to consider individual complaints.
Amend and enact laws to criminalize torture
- Amend 18 U.S.C. § 2340-2340A to define torture as broadly as the definition provided in Article 1 of the Convention Against Torture.
- Enact a new federal law prohibiting torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment as defined by the Convention Against Torture, and make it applicable in the United States.
- Amend the Uniform Code of Military Justice specifically to criminalize torture as defined by the Convention Against Torture.
Ensure access to all prisoners and detainees in U.S. custody
- Grant full access, including private visitation rights, by United Nations’ independent human rights experts, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), and other independent human rights monitors to all prisoners and detainees in the custody of the United States.
- Grant all prisoners and detainees prompt access to legal counsel, independent doctors, and relatives.
- Grant all prisoners and detainees access to courts to challenge the legality of their detention. Presume detainees captured on the battlefield during international conflicts to be prisoners of war unless and until a competent tribunal determines otherwise under the Geneva Conventions.
- End the use of military commissions.
- Grant all Guantánamo detainees a speedy and fair trial before an impartial body, in accordance with internationally recognized due process guarantees, or release them.
- Ensure compliance with international juvenile detention and trial standards for child detainees.
End secret detentions
- Cease all secret detentions, including in all detention facilities under the effective control of the United States.
- Hold all detainees only in officially recognized detention facilities, disclose the location of all detention facilities, and articulate the legal basis under which each detainee is being held.
- Allow immediate and unfettered access to all secret detention facilities by the ICRC and other independent human rights monitors.
- Clarify the whereabouts of all persons detained after September 11, 2001 who are in the custody of the United States.
Interrogations must comply with human rights standards
- Ensure that all interrogation rules, instructions, methods and practices prohibited by the Convention Against Torture are not utilized by United States’ officials in any circumstances.
End practice of unlawful renditions
- Immediately end practice of rendering individuals to secret detention facilities or to countries where torture is a serious human rights problem.
- Ensure effective judicial review of all transfers of persons between the United States and other countries, and prohibit transfers unless there are "substantial grounds" to believe that a detainee will not be tortured if transferred.
- End reliance on diplomatic assurances to facilitate the transfer of detainees to a country where there are substantial grounds for believing that such persons might be subjected to torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
Bring conditions of confinement into conformance with the Convention Against Torture
- Ensure that all prisoners and detainees are confined in conditions consistent with their human dignity. No prisoner or detainee should be confined in overcrowded, dangerous, filthy, or intolerably hot or cold cells.
- Ensure that all conditions of confinement at the federal, state, and local level conform to the minimum requirements of the United Nations’ Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners and international juvenile detention standards.
- Ensure that all prisoners and detainees have prompt access to medical care in prisons and detention facilities, including psychiatric and psychological care.
Prohibit long-term solitary confinement and sensory deprivation of persons in custody
- End the practice of long-term solitary confinement and sensory deprivation for all persons in confinement.
- Initiate a national review of the excessively harsh regime and conditions in supermax facilities and the criteria for transferring persons to such facilities.
Monitor and investigate the use of dangerous and cruel restraint procedures
- Ban the use of Tasers by law enforcement officials and correctional officers at the federal, state, and local level, pending outcome of an independent inquiry into their safety and use.
- Impose nationwide and enforceable standards, with adequate medical supervision, on the use of restraint chairs and pepper spray by law enforcement and correctional officials at the federal, state, and local level.
Investigate and prosecute prison rape and sexual assault
- Investigate and prosecute all allegations of prison rape and sexual assault.
- Strictly enforce federal and state criminal laws prohibiting rape and sexual assault in prisons and other detention facilities.
Abolish life without parole for juveniles
- Abolish the sentence of life without parole for children convicted of federal crimes. Enable child offenders serving life without parole to have their cases reviewed by a court for reassessment with the possibility for parole.
Amend or repeal the Prison Litigation Reform Act
- Amend or repeal the excessive requirement under the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA)that prisoners exhaust all internal prison grievance before bringing a federal lawsuit.
- Repeal the PLRA’s requirement that prisoners must show physical injury to prove mental and emotional injury.
- Develop means of central collection of statistical data to ensure compliance with the Convention Against Torture in U.S. prisons, jails and other detention facilities.
Prohibit the use of coerced testimony
- Prohibit the use of any evidence coerced as a result of torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment in any civilian or military proceeding.
Conduct independent and prompt investigations of all allegations of torture and abuse of persons in the custody
- Thoroughly and promptly investigate all allegations of torture and abuse in United States’ prisons, jails and other detention facilities, including all facilities under the effective control of the United States.
- Establish an independent commission to investigate the policies and practices that have led to the widespread and systemic torture and abuse of detainees in United States’ custody in Afghanistan, Guantánamo, Iraq, and in secret detention facilities.
- Establish independent oversight bodies to investigate complaints of torture and abuse by law enforcement and correctional officers and to monitor conditions in all prisons, jails, and detention centers in the United States.
Hold accountable all perpetrators of torture and abuse
- Hold accountable all individuals, including government officials, members of the armed forces, intelligence personnel, correctional officers, police, prison guards, medical personnel, and private government contractors and interpreters who have authorized, condoned or committed torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
- Prosecute crimes of torture and abuse as aggressively as other criminal actions involving bodily or mental harm.
Provide human rights training to all government officials
- Provide information and training regarding the provisions of the Convention Against Torture to all government officials and private government contractors involved in the custody of any person by the United States, including members of the armed forces, intelligence personnel, correctional officers, police, prison guards, medical personnel, private contractors and interpreters, and prosecutors and judges.
- Commit to a nationwide public education program regarding the provisions of the Convention Against Torture.
Notes
[1] U.S. Department of State, Second Periodic Report to the Committee against Torture, U.N. Doc. CAT/C/48/Add.4 (June 2005) ("U.S. Report"), Sec. I, para. 4 (all references to the Annex to the U.S. Report herein are to the updated Annex dated October 2005).
[2] Memorandum from Jay S. Bybee, Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal Counsel to Alberto Gonzales, Counsel to the President, Re: Standards of Conduct for Interrogation Under 18 U.S.C. §§ 23440-23440A (Aug. 1, 2002) (hereinafter "Bybee, August 2002 Memorandum"), available at http://news.findlaw.com/wp/docs/doj/bybee80102mem.pdf.
[3] Dep’t of Defense, Working Group Report on Detainee Interrogations in the Global War on Terrorism: Assessment of Legal, Historical, Policy and Operational Considerations, Apr. 4, 2003 (hereinafter "Dep’t of Defense, Working Group Report"), reprinted in The Torture Papers; The Road to Abu Ghraib, at 289 (Karen J. Greenberg and Joshua L. Dratel, ed., Cambridge Univ. Press, 2005).
[4] Responses from Alberto R. Gonzales (then Nominee for Attorney General) to the written questions of Senator Dianne Feinstein (Jan. 2005), excerpt available at http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/
ENGAMR510832005?open&of=ENG-IRQ. See also Eric Lichtblau, Gonzales Says Humane-Policy Order Doesn’t Bind C.I.A., N.Y. Times, Jan. 19, 2005.
[5] Detainee Treatment Act, Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2006, Pub.L. No. 109-148, Div. A, Title X, § 1003, 119 Stat. 2739 (2005).
[6] In 2003, the ACLU, the Center for Constitutional Rights, Physicians for Human Rights, Veterans for Common Sense, and Veterans for Peace filed a FOIA request seeking documents from the Central Intelligence Agency, Department of Justice, the Department of State, the Department of Defense and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, concerning treatment of detainees in U.S. custody in Afghanistan, Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, and Iraq. The vast majority of documents were released only following protracted and ongoing litigation and court orders directing government agencies to produce documents. Stipulation and Order, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation v. Dep’t of Defense, No. 04-cv-4151 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 17, 2004), available at http://www.aclu.org/torturefoia/legaldocuments/
eeOrderforResponsivedocs.pdf. The CIA has yet to release any documents to the ACLU and this issue is currently before the courts. See generally http://www.aclu.org/torturefoia/legaldocuments/index.html for the Torture FOIA legal documents.
[7] U.S. Dept. of Army, Field Manual 34-52: Intelligence Interrogation (Sept. 28, 1992) (hereinafter "Army Field Manual 34-52"), available at http://www.fas.org/irp/doddir/army/fm34-52.pdf.
[8] Iraq General’s Killer Reprimanded, BBC World Service, Jan. 24, 2006.
[9] Gregg K. Kakesako, Schofield Soldier gets 3-year term in Shooting, Honolulu Star Bulletin, Aug. 6, 2004.
[10] Prison Litigation Reform Act, Pub.L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321 (1996).
[11] See generally Annex B (documents obtained through ACLU Freedom of Information Act litigation regarding treatment of detainees in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Guantánamo).
[12] Annex B49, Excerpt from Memorandum Re: 4th Infantry Division Detainee Operations Assessment Trip Report (full record available at http://action.aclu.org/torturefoia/released/091505/15937.pdf.
[13] Annex B1-3, Excerpt from AR 15-6 Investigation Report (full record available at http://www.aclu.org/projects/foiasearch/pdf/DOD002818.pdf; Annex B4-5, Excerpt from AR-15 Investigation Report (full document available at http://www.aclu.org/projects/foiasearch/pdf/DODDOA026827.pdf).