ACLU of Kentucky Says Protest Ban at Funerals Restricts Free Speech (5/2/2006)
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: media@aclu.orgFRANKFORT, KY -- The American Civil Liberties Union of Kentucky filed a
federal lawsuit today challenging restrictions on freedom of speech and
expression in two bills passed during the 2006 session of the Kentucky General
Assembly.
The new Kentucky laws create restrictions near funerals, wakes, memorial
services and burials, which, the ACLU argues in the court papers, prohibit
non-disruptive, non-disorderly speech and visual displays.
"We cannot prohibit free expression because we don't like certain activities,
nor can we suppress the speech of groups or individuals simply because we find
their message distasteful," said Lili S. Lutgens, ACLU of Kentucky staff
attorney. "The First Amendment applies to everyone."
House Bill 333 and Senate Bill 93, which were signed into law by Gov. Ernie
Fletcher on March 27, are aimed at members of the Westboro Baptist Church in
Topeka, Kansas. The church group protests at the funerals of military
members, gays and people who have died from AIDS, claiming that God is punishing
the United States for supporting homosexuality.
The ACLU lawsuit recognizes that Kentucky has an interest in showing respect
and compassion for the deceased and for their families, but argues that sections
of these laws go too far in prohibiting peaceful protests.
According to the ACLU brief, the new laws are so broad that they could make
it a crime to whistle while walking down the street within earshot of a funeral
or to stop for a conversation on a public sidewalk adjacent to a funeral home or
place of worship while a funeral service is in progress. The laws may even
prevent groups like the Patriot Guard Riders, a group of pro-military bikers,
from being close enough to support the families of soldiers who have died in
Iraq during military funeral protests.
The ACLU filed the lawsuit on behalf of Mercer County resident Bart McQueary,
who has protested with members of the Kansas group on three occasions over the
last few years. McQueary wishes to peacefully protest with the group in
the future.
“Mr. McQueary clearly has the right to express his message in a
non-disruptive manner, even if others disagree with him,” said Lutgens.
“That’s what the First Amendment is all about.”
The new laws ban peaceful protests within 300 feet of a funeral, and would
restrict McQueary and others from making sounds, displaying signs or
distributing literature in a non-disruptive manner without approval from the
family of the deceased or from the person conducting the service.
Because McQueary now fears prosecution, Lutgens said he’s unable to express
his opinion.
A copy of the complaint is online at: www.aclu.org/freespeech/protest/25439lgl20060502.html
|