American Civil Liberties Union

Drug Policy:
The ACLU Drug Law Reform Project is a division of the national ACLU. Our goal is to end punitive drug policies that cause the widespread violation of constitutional and human rights, as well as unprecedented levels of incarceration.


ACLU Blog of Rights ACLU Legacy Challenge - See and Hear What Others Have Done

Freedom Files - Season 2
Ideological Exclusion

ACLU NewsfeedsACLU News Feed
ACLU Blog
ACLU Podcasts

Drug Policy : Racial Justice : Legal Documents

U.S. v. Ross - ACLU Opening Brief (11/21/2008)
The ACLU's opening brief to the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals asserting a constitutional right to legal counsel for those seeking resentencing based on the recent reduction to the federal sentencing guideline range for crack-cocaine offenses.

U.S. v. Goddard - Petition for Rehearing or Rehearing En Banc (09/05/2007)
An ACLU filing challenging the constitutionality of the police tactic known as a "jump out," widely employed against minority residents of high-crime neighborhoods. The ACLU is seeking a rehearing in the case of Melvin Goddard, who was arrested utilizing this aggressive tactic used to detain and search suspects.

Kimbrough v. United States - ACLU Amicus Brief (07/26/2007)

U.S. v. Spears - Amicus Brief in Support of Appellee (06/01/2006)
A friend-of-the-court brief submitted by the ACLU and noted sentencing experts in support of the right of judges to depart from the notorious 100-to-1 crack/powder cocaine sentencing disparity.

U.S. v. Ricks - Brief in Support of Appellee (05/18/2006)
A friend-of-the-court brief submitted by the ACLU Drug Law Reform Project and a coalition of renowned law professors and sentencing experts in support of judges' right to depart from the 100-to-1 crack/powder sentencing disparity in light of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Booker v. U.S.

Motion for Dismissal in U.S. v. Patel (Operation Meth Merchant) (04/05/2006)

U.S. v. Castillo - Amicus Brief in Support of Appellee (02/17/2006)
A friend-of-the-court brief submitted by the ACLU and noted sentencing experts in support of the right of judges to depart from the notorious 100-to-1 crack/powder cocaine sentencing disparity.

ACLU Coalition Amicus Brief in U.S. v. Starks (01/20/2006)
ACLU and noted sentencing experts brief arguing for judges' right to reject controversial 100-to-1 crack/powder cocaine sentencing disparity.

Magistrate Judge Manske's Report and Recommendations Denying Philip Crowell's Motion for Summary Judgment (04/14/2005)

Magistrate Judge Manske's Report and Recommendations Denying Thomas Hendrix's Motion for Summary Judgment (04/14/2005)

Magistrate Judge Mankse's Report and Recommendation Denying John Paschall's Motion for Summary Judgment in Kelly v. Paschall (04/13/2005)

Magistrate Judge Mankse's Report and Recommendation Denying Ron Garney's Motion for Summary Judgment in Kelly v. Paschall (04/13/2005)

Magistrate Judge Mankse's Report and Recommendation Denying Robertson County's Motion for Summary Judgment in Kelly v. Paschall (04/13/2005)

Alexander v. Goose Creek - Complaint (12/15/2003)

Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint in Kelly v. Paschall (05/13/2003)

Click to show/hide issues list
Your Local ACLUcongressional scorecardmultimediaforumspublicationssupport usstorecontact