ACLU Coalition Letter to House Judiciary Leadership Urging Them Not to Reauthorize the Byrne Justice Assistance Grant (6/17/2008)
ATTN: Judiciary
StaffersMARK UP WEDNESDAY,
JUNE 18th June 17, 2008 The Honorable John Conyers 2426 Rayburn House
Office Building Washington, DC
20515-2214 The Honorable Lamar Smith 2409 Rayburn House
Office Building Washington, DC
20515-2114 Dear Chairman Conyers and Ranking Member Smith:
The undersigned groups
urge you to not reauthorize the Byrne Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) program
without reforming it. The program is perpetuating racial disparities, police
corruption, over-incarceration and civil rights abuses. This is especially the
case when it comes to the program’s funding of hundreds of regional anti-drug
task forces across the country. These task forces, which have very little state
or federal oversight and are prone to corruption, are at the center of some of
our country’s most horrific law enforcement scandals. The most well-known
Byrne-funded scandal occurred in Tulia, Texas
where dozens of African American residents (representing nearly half of the
adult black population) were arrested, prosecuted and sentenced to decades in
prison, even though the only evidence against them was the uncorroborated
testimony of one white undercover officer with a history of lying and racism.
The undercover officer worked alone,
and had no audiotapes, video surveillance, or eyewitnesses to corroborate his
allegations. Suspicions arose after two of the accused defendants were
able to produce firm evidence showing they were out of state or at work at the
time of the alleged drug buys. Texas Governor Rick Perry eventually pardoned the
Tulia defendants (after four years of imprisonment), but these kinds of scandals
continue to plague the Byrne grant program. These scandals are not the result of a few “bad apples” in
law enforcement; they are the result of a fundamentally flawed bureaucracy that
is prone to corruption by its very structure. Byrne-funded regional anti-drug
task forces are federally funded, state managed, and locally staffed, which
means they really do not have to answer to anyone. In fact, their ability to
perpetuate themselves through asset forfeiture and federal funding makes them
unaccountable to local taxpayers and governing bodies. The Criminal Jurisprudence Committee of the Texas House of
Representatives is one of the few governing bodies to examine why Byrne-funded
task forces are so engulfed in scandals. After comprehensive hearings, the
Committee decided to essentially abolish the state’s federally-funded regional
anti-drug task forces because they are inherently prone to corruption. The
Committee reported, “Continuing to sanction task
force operations as stand-alone law enforcement entities - with widespread
authority to operate at will across multiple jurisdictional lines - should not
continue. The current approach violates practically every sound principle of
police oversight and accountability applicable to narcotics
interdiction." A 2002 report by the ACLU of Texas identified seventeen
scandals involving Byrne-funded anti-drug task forces in Texas, including cases of
falsifying government records, witness tampering, fabricating evidence, stealing
drugs from evidence lockers, selling drugs to children, large-scale racial
profiling, sexual harassment, and other abuses of official capacity.
Byrne-related scandals have grown so prolific that the Republican-led Texas legislature
recently passed several reforms in response to them, including outlawing racial
profiling and changing Texas law to prohibit people from being
convicted of drug offenses based solely on the word of an undercover informant. Texas is not the only state suffering from
Byrne-funded law enforcement scandals. Recent scandals in other states include
the misuse of millions of dollars in federal grant money in Kentucky and Massachusetts, false
convictions based on police perjury in Missouri, and making deals with drug offenders
to drop or lower their charges in exchange for money or vehicles in Alabama, Arkansas,
Georgia, Massachusetts, New York, Ohio, and Wisconsin. A 2001 study by the Government
Accountability Office found that the federal government fails to adequately
monitor the grant program and hold grantees accountable. We urge you to overhaul the Byrne Justice Assistance Grant
program. While there are a number of reforms that should be considered, three
stand out:
·
Require law enforcement agencies receiving federal funding
to enforce a ban on racial profiling and document their traffic stops, arrests,
and searches by race, ethnicity, and gender (and designating money for data
collection if needed). ·
Mandate that federal funding can only be used for anti-drug
activity if a state adopts legislation preventing people from being convicted of
drug offenses based solely on the word of another individual without any corroborating evidence. ·
Condition federal
funding on establishment of statewide indigent defense systems, or require that
a percentage of the federal grant go toward indigent defense
programs.
These sensible
reforms would go a long way towards improving the program. If steps are not taken to reduce
corruption and protect civil rights, we urge you to re-consider reauthorizing
the Byrne Justice Assistance Grant program.
American Civil Liberties Union American Civil Liberties Union of Texas The Brennan Center for Justice Colorado Criminal Justice Reform Coalition Community Court Drug Policy Alliance Drug Reform Coordination Network Interfaith Drug Policy Initiative Justice Policy Institute Legal Services for Prisoners with Children National Association of Blacks in Criminal Justice National African-American Drug Policy Coalition National Black Police Association National Council of La Raza Open Society
Policy Center Prisons Foundation The Rebecca Project for Human Rights Reentry Solutions Tejano Center for Community Concerns United Methodist Church, General Board of Church and
Society Unitarian Universalist Association of Congregations
|